CNet occasionally posts decent reviews. Unfortunately their current roundup of RSS readers managed to make one severe screwup: they reviewed the old version of Google Reader, not the version you get if you have used the site in the last month.
This was reported by Micro Persusasion who unfortunately didn’t catch the gaff before calling the reporting “useful”. Given that they can’t even review the right product and are apparently using data that’s at least a month old, it makes me question the accuracy of everything else in the rest of their piece.
Let's Connect!