<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Your Web Host Censor Your Blog?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/</link>
	<description>Random rants and wandering words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 16:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff @ DreamHost</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1891</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff @ DreamHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 00:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/#comment-1891</guid>
		<description>Another update. :)

Turns out that Mr. Krug&#039;s comments were eaten by a WordPress plug-in we use called SpamKarma - apparently it thought his comments were spam and retroactively removed them.

No DreamHost employee was involved in selectively censoring his comments. It was an automated removal.

I&#039;ve posted a comment to this effect to his site, though it&#039;s stuck in moderation until his approves it. We&#039;ve explained the situation and have asked that if he has similar concerns in the future he contact us for an explanation before posting such accusations to his weblog.

- Jeff C. @ DreamHost Web Hosting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another update. <img src='http://www.anotherblogger.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Turns out that Mr. Krug&#8217;s comments were eaten by a WordPress plug-in we use called SpamKarma &#8211; apparently it thought his comments were spam and retroactively removed them.</p>
<p>No DreamHost employee was involved in selectively censoring his comments. It was an automated removal.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve posted a comment to this effect to his site, though it&#8217;s stuck in moderation until his approves it. We&#8217;ve explained the situation and have asked that if he has similar concerns in the future he contact us for an explanation before posting such accusations to his weblog.</p>
<p>- Jeff C. @ DreamHost Web Hosting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff @ DreamHost</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1888</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff @ DreamHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 22:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/#comment-1888</guid>
		<description>Just an addendum - as there was another comment later on that quoted the original post, it looks like maybe it was removed. It&#039;s still not clear if this was an intentional act by an employee or if someone was a bit overzealous in removing spam postings, but I wanted to make it clear that I am not calling the original weblogger a liar.

The comment itself wasn&#039;t all that bad, all things considered - we&#039;ve heard much worse - so why someone here would intentionally remove it is beyond me. We have more important things to do than get rid of critical posts.

- Jeff C. @ DreamHost Web Hosting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just an addendum &#8211; as there was another comment later on that quoted the original post, it looks like maybe it was removed. It&#8217;s still not clear if this was an intentional act by an employee or if someone was a bit overzealous in removing spam postings, but I wanted to make it clear that I am not calling the original weblogger a liar.</p>
<p>The comment itself wasn&#8217;t all that bad, all things considered &#8211; we&#8217;ve heard much worse &#8211; so why someone here would intentionally remove it is beyond me. We have more important things to do than get rid of critical posts.</p>
<p>- Jeff C. @ DreamHost Web Hosting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff @ DreamHost</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff @ DreamHost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/#comment-1887</guid>
		<description>Just a clarification - they are/were claiming that we censor _our_ own weblog comments, which as far as we can tell is not the case.

We definitely don&#039;t censor customer sites/weblogs, and the original poster of that weblog entry did not claim that was occurring.

- Jeff C. @ DreamHost Web Hosting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a clarification &#8211; they are/were claiming that we censor _our_ own weblog comments, which as far as we can tell is not the case.</p>
<p>We definitely don&#8217;t censor customer sites/weblogs, and the original poster of that weblog entry did not claim that was occurring.</p>
<p>- Jeff C. @ DreamHost Web Hosting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: visitor</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/comment-page-1/#comment-1886</link>
		<dc:creator>visitor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/2006/11/10/does-your-web-host-censor-your-blog/#comment-1886</guid>
		<description>The article you&#039;re linking to doesn&#039;t even claim what your title says: it&#039;s claiming censorship of comments on the company&#039;s blog, at blog.dreamhost.com or dreamhoststatus.com - not on the private blogs of its customers.  Whether or not that&#039;s true is up in the air, but before we go &quot;OMG the children!&quot; let&#039;s try to understand the substance of the matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article you&#8217;re linking to doesn&#8217;t even claim what your title says: it&#8217;s claiming censorship of comments on the company&#8217;s blog, at blog.dreamhost.com or dreamhoststatus.com &#8211; not on the private blogs of its customers.  Whether or not that&#8217;s true is up in the air, but before we go &#8220;OMG the children!&#8221; let&#8217;s try to understand the substance of the matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

