<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BarCampPortland Journalism Recap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/05/04/barcampportland-journalism-recap/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/05/04/barcampportland-journalism-recap/</link>
	<description>Random rants and wandering words</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:39:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron B. Hockley</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/05/04/barcampportland-journalism-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-462450</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron B. Hockley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/?p=1224#comment-462450</guid>
		<description>We talked a bit about the issue of abusive commenters... in my opinion the best option is to allow for community-driven moderation by providing a reputation or karma system.  Look at how the (IntenseDebate-powered) comments work on KATU&#039;s site.  Each comment can be given a thumbs-up or thumbs-down vote.  Collectively these votes work to increase or decrease a commenters reputation.

The next step (not implemented on KATU, but existing in places like Slashdot) is to allow one to filter/hide comments that are below a certain threshold, ensuring that one generally won&#039;t ever notice the trolls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We talked a bit about the issue of abusive commenters&#8230; in my opinion the best option is to allow for community-driven moderation by providing a reputation or karma system.  Look at how the (IntenseDebate-powered) comments work on KATU&#8217;s site.  Each comment can be given a thumbs-up or thumbs-down vote.  Collectively these votes work to increase or decrease a commenters reputation.</p>
<p>The next step (not implemented on KATU, but existing in places like Slashdot) is to allow one to filter/hide comments that are below a certain threshold, ensuring that one generally won&#8217;t ever notice the trolls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen McDade</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/05/04/barcampportland-journalism-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-462445</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen McDade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 04:10:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/?p=1224#comment-462445</guid>
		<description>Thanks, Steph - you&#039;re right, that link does outline helpful solutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, Steph &#8211; you&#8217;re right, that link does outline helpful solutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steph</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/05/04/barcampportland-journalism-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-462443</link>
		<dc:creator>Steph</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/?p=1224#comment-462443</guid>
		<description>I think the @oregoniansteve link sort of touched on potential solutions for that.  i do have a bias, and do want to hear comments-- but only the constructive ones (good or bad.. key is constructive).  we sadly get so much drivel it sometimes makes me shake my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the @oregoniansteve link sort of touched on potential solutions for that.  i do have a bias, and do want to hear comments&#8211; but only the constructive ones (good or bad.. key is constructive).  we sadly get so much drivel it sometimes makes me shake my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathleen McDade</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherblogger.com/2009/05/04/barcampportland-journalism-recap/comment-page-1/#comment-462441</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathleen McDade</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 03:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherblogger.com/?p=1224#comment-462441</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m curious - was there any talk about how comment systems are often abused, as well?  I mean, comments left on O-Live, KATU.com, etc., are generally awful - mean-spirited, ignorant, contain personal attacks...hard to have a conversation around that.  And I imagine that seeing those kinds of comments does NOT make newspapers want to do anything more interactive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m curious &#8211; was there any talk about how comment systems are often abused, as well?  I mean, comments left on O-Live, KATU.com, etc., are generally awful &#8211; mean-spirited, ignorant, contain personal attacks&#8230;hard to have a conversation around that.  And I imagine that seeing those kinds of comments does NOT make newspapers want to do anything more interactive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
